DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CompassModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed197 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower160 HP
320 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,40 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,40 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,10 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4555 mm
1812 mmWidth1840 mm
1718 mmHeight1710 mm
1634 KgWeight1488 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…