DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeJeep
CX-5ModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
160 HPPower136 HP
208 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,40 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,40 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4448 mm
1840 mmWidth1812 mm
1710 mmHeight1718 mm
1488 KgWeight1634 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…