DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jeep Compass vs 2017 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CompassModelCX-5
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,10 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
170 HPPower165 HP
380 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,60 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,10 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,70 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
225/55 R18 VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4394 mmLength4555 mm
1819 mmWidth1840 mm
1647 mmHeight1710 mm
1619 KgWeight1315 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jeep Compass and 2017 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…