DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 FAW Besturn X80 vs 2017 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeJeep
Besturn X80ModelCompass
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,10 s
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
147 HPPower170 HP
184 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,60 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,10 lt
—Average consumption5,70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
215/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R18 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4586 mmLength4394 mm
1820 mmWidth1819 mm
1695 mmHeight1647 mm
1500 KgWeight1619 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 FAW Besturn X80 and 2017 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…