DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda CX-5 vs 2017 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeJeep
CX-5ModelCompass
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,10 s
197 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
165 HPPower170 HP
210 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption6,60 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,10 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,70 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
—Tyre size225/55 R18 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4394 mm
1840 mmWidth1819 mm
1710 mmHeight1647 mm
1315 KgWeight1619 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2636 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda CX-5 and 2017 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…