DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jeep Compass vs 2017 FAW Besturn X80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeFAW
CompassModelBesturn X80
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,10 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
170 HPPower147 HP
380 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,60 ltUrban consumption—
5,10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,70 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
225/55 R18 VTyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4394 mmLength4586 mm
1819 mmWidth1820 mm
1647 mmHeight1695 mm
1619 KgWeight1500 Kg
2636 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jeep Compass and 2017 FAW Besturn X80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…