DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Jeep Cherokee vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeLand Rover
CherokeeModelRange Rover
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2464 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
127 HPPower136 HP
234 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank100 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4713 mm
1763 mmWidth1853 mm
1624 mmHeight1817 mm
1420 KgWeight2115 Kg
2576 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Jeep Cherokee and 2000 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…