DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJeep
Range RoverModelCherokee
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
136 HPPower127 HP
270 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4254 mm
1853 mmWidth1763 mm
1817 mmHeight1624 mm
2115 KgWeight1420 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2576 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…