2000 • Subaru
Outback
Subaru Outback 2.5 i 4WD (156 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Subaru Outback vs 2000 Jeep Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.5 i SE (127 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Subaru Outback
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru OutbackSpecificationJeep Cherokee
SubaruMakeJeep
OutbackModelCherokee
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Subaru OutbackSpecificationJeep Cherokee
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2464 cc
156 HPPower127 HP
223 NmTorque234 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru OutbackSpecificationJeep Cherokee
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru OutbackSpecificationJeep Cherokee
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru OutbackSpecificationJeep Cherokee
4730 mmLength4254 mm
1770 mmWidth1763 mm
1545 mmHeight1624 mm
1480 KgWeight1420 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2576 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Subaru Outback and 2000 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…