DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Cherokee vs 2013 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CherokeeModel6
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
187 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2360 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
229 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,0 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
9Gears6
225/60 R17; 225/55 R18; 245/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4624 mmLength4765 mm
1859 mmWidth1795 mm
1670 mmHeight1490 mm
1842-1866 KgWeight1575 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Cherokee and 2013 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…