2013 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (180 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
2013 Mazda 6 vs 2013 Jeep Cherokee Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.4 MultiAir2 TIGERSHARK (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Cherokee
MazdaMakeJeep
6ModelCherokee
2013Model year2013
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Cherokee
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
216 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
0 NmTorque229 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Cherokee
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Cherokee
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears9
—Tyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18; 245/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Cherokee
4765 mmLength4624 mm
1795 mmWidth1859 mm
1490 mmHeight1670 mm
1575 KgWeight1842-1866 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 6 and 2013 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…