DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2013 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeJeep
ASXModelCherokee
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
190 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
147 HPPower177 HP
360 NmTorque229 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears9
215/60 R17 96HTyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18; 245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4624 mm
1770 mmWidth1859 mm
1615 mmHeight1670 mm
1520 KgWeight1842-1866 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mitsubishi ASX and 2013 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…