DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi 80 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 9-3
AudiMakeSaab
80Model9-3
1996Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 9-3
6,1 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
242 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
230 HPPower230 HP
380 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption13,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 9-3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationSaab 9-3
4509 mmLength4629 mm
1695 mmWidth1711 mm
1386 mmHeight1428 mm
1560 KgWeight1380 Kg
2597 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi 80 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…