DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo C70 vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

74.5–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C70SpecificationAudi 80
VolvoMakeAudi
C70Model80
2000Model year1996
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Volvo C70SpecificationAudi 80
6,9 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
250 km/hTop speed242 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
240 HPPower230 HP
330 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C70SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,0 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,5 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C70SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo C70SpecificationAudi 80
4720 mmLength4509 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1386 mm
1500 KgWeight1560 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2597 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo C70 and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…