DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Galant vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
GalantModel80
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
210 km/hTop speed242 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
240 HPPower230 HP
309 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank64 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4509 mm
1730 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1386 mm
1430 KgWeight1560 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2597 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Galant and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…