DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Spyker C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Spyker C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationSpyker C8
JaguarMakeSpyker
XJModelC8
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationSpyker C8
5,3 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed300 km/h
4196 ccEngine displacement4172 cc
400 HPPower400 HP
541 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationSpyker C8
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank100 lt
18,6 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
12,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationSpyker C8
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/40 R19Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationSpyker C8
5090 mmLength4050 mm
1860 mmWidth1880 mm
1448 mmHeight1080 mm
1665 KgWeight1000 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Spyker C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Spyker C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…