DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Wiesmann GT vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Wiesmann GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

WiesmannMakeJaguar
GTModelXJ
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,6 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
291 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4395 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
407 HPPower400 HP
600 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank85 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption18,6 lt
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/45 R18Tyre size255/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength5090 mm
1880 mmWidth1860 mm
1190 mmHeight1448 mm
1455 KgWeight1665 Kg
2507 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Wiesmann GT and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Wiesmann GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…