DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Spyker C8 vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Spyker C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Spyker C8SpecificationJaguar XJ
SpykerMakeJaguar
C8ModelXJ
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Spyker C8SpecificationJaguar XJ
4,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
300 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4172 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
400 HPPower400 HP
480 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Spyker C8SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption18,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption12,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Spyker C8SpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size255/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Spyker C8SpecificationJaguar XJ
4050 mmLength5090 mm
1880 mmWidth1860 mm
1080 mmHeight1448 mm
1000 KgWeight1665 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Spyker C8 and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Spyker C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…