DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Infiniti FX vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Infiniti FX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

InfinitiMakeJaguar
FXModelXJ
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
221 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
283 HPPower284 HP
366 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank81 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/60 R18Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4803 mmLength5023 mm
1925 mmWidth1799 mm
1674 mmHeight1345 mm
1960 KgWeight1780 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Infiniti FX and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Infiniti FX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…