DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chrysler Concorde vs 2003 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeJaguar
ConcordeModelXJ
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
225 km/hTop speed240 km/h
3518 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
258 HPPower284 HP
348 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank81 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5023 mm
1890 mmWidth1799 mm
1435 mmHeight1345 mm
1690 KgWeight1780 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chrysler Concorde and 2003 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…