DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jaguar XJ vs 2011 Kia Cadenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeKia
XJModelCadenza
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement3470 cc
275 HPPower290 HP
0 NmTorque338 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4965 mm
—Width1850 mm
—Height1475 mm
—Weight1575 Kg
—Wheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jaguar XJ and 2011 Kia Cadenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…