DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Alfa Romeo 159 vs 2011 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeJaguar
159ModelXJ
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h6,4 s
240 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3195 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
260 HPPower275 HP
322 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank82 lt
15,9 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4660 mmLength—
1828 mmWidth—
1417 mmHeight—
1740 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Alfa Romeo 159 and 2011 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…