DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 GMC Terrain vs 2011 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

78.75–79.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJaguar
TerrainModelXJ
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
264 HPPower275 HP
301 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
79 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4707 mmLength—
1849 mmWidth—
1684 mmHeight—
1769 KgWeight—
2858 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 GMC Terrain and 2011 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…