DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2013 Alpina D3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina D3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D3
JaguarMakeAlpina
XJModelD3
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D3
5,9 s0–100 km/h4,6 s
250 km/hTop speed278 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
340 HPPower350 HP
450 NmTorque700 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
82 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch Tronic
—Tyre sizeFront tyres: 245/35 ZR19 90Y XL, Rear tyres: 265/35 ZR19 94Y XL
YesABS—

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina D3
5127 mmLength—
1899 mmWidth—
1456 mmHeight—
1748 KgWeight—
3032 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2013 Alpina D3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina D3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…