DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Alpina XD3 vs 2012 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina XD3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XJ
AlpinaMakeJaguar
XD3ModelXJ
2013Model year2012
CrossoverBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4,9 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
253 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
350 HPPower340 HP
700 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XJ
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank82 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8
255/40 ZR20; 285/35 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina XD3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4647 mmLength5127 mm
1901 mmWidth1899 mm
1670 mmHeight1456 mm
1910 KgWeight1748 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase3032 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Alpina XD3 and 2012 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina XD3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…