DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Lotus Evora vs 2012 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lotus Evora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LotusMakeJaguar
EvoraModelXJ
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
2/2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

4,6 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
286 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3456 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
350 HPPower340 HP
400 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank82 lt
14,2 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4361 mmLength5127 mm
—Width1899 mm
1229 mmHeight1456 mm
1436 KgWeight1748 Kg
2575 mmWheelbase3032 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Lotus Evora and 2012 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lotus Evora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…