DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina B3
JaguarMakeAlpina
XJModelB3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina B3
5,9 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed300 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
340 HPPower408 HP
450 NmTorque540 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size245/35 ZR19; 265/35 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationAlpina B3
5127 mmLength4668 mm
1899 mmWidth1782 mm
1456 mmHeight1405 mm
1748 KgWeight1535 Kg
3032 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…