DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XJ vs 2017 Borgward BX7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Borgward BX7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeBorgward
XJModelBX7
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h—
241 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1981 cc
240 HPPower224 HP
340 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears6
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size235/60 R18
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4691 mmLength4715 mm
1939 mmWidth1911 mm
1468 mmHeight1690 mm
1735 kgWeight1740 Kg
540 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XJ and 2017 Borgward BX7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Borgward BX7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…