DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 KTM X-Bow vs 2017 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KTM X-BowSpecificationJaguar XJ
KTMMakeJaguar
X-BowModelXJ
2016Model year2017
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

KTM X-BowSpecificationJaguar XJ
3,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
220 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
240 HPPower240 HP
310 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

KTM X-BowSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

KTM X-BowSpecificationJaguar XJ
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
—TransmissionAT
205/40 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size17
—ABSNo

Dimensions

KTM X-BowSpecificationJaguar XJ
3738 mmLength4691 mm
1915 mmWidth1939 mm
1202 mmHeight1468 mm
790 KgWeight1735 kg
—Luggage capacity540 lt
2430 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 KTM X-Bow and 2017 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…