DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2018 MG HS vs 2017 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG HS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG HSSpecificationJaguar XJ
MGMakeJaguar
HSModelXJ
2018Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

MG HSSpecificationJaguar XJ
—0–100 km/h7,9 s
210 km/hTop speed241 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
231 HPPower240 HP
360 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG HSSpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG HSSpecificationJaguar XJ
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 DCTGears8
—TransmissionAT
235/50 R18Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

MG HSSpecificationJaguar XJ
4574 mmLength4691 mm
1876 mmWidth1939 mm
1664 mmHeight1468 mm
1630 KgWeight1735 kg
—Luggage capacity540 lt
2720 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2018 MG HS and 2017 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG HS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…