DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XJ vs 2018 MG HS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG HS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationMG HS
JaguarMakeMG
XJModelHS
2017Model year2018
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationMG HS
7,9 s0–100 km/h—
241 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
240 HPPower231 HP
340 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationMG HS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationMG HS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6 DCT
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size235/50 R18
NoABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationMG HS
4691 mmLength4574 mm
1939 mmWidth1876 mm
1468 mmHeight1664 mm
1735 kgWeight1630 Kg
540 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XJ and 2018 MG HS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG HS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…