DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XJ vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationKTM X-Bow
JaguarMakeKTM
XJModelX-Bow
2017Model year2016
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationKTM X-Bow
7,9 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
241 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower240 HP
340 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank40 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationKTM X-Bow
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
ATTransmission—
17Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
NoABS—

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4691 mmLength3738 mm
1939 mmWidth1915 mm
1468 mmHeight1202 mm
1735 kgWeight790 Kg
540 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XJ and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…