DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeChevrolet
XFModelCaptiva
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
209 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
8Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
—Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4961 mmLength4679 mm
1939 mmWidth1868 mm
1468 mmHeight1756 mm
1735 KgWeight1903 kg
—Luggage capacity447 lt
2909 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…