DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Freelander vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeJaguar
FreelanderModelXF
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
190 HPPower163 HP
420 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4961 mm
—Width1939 mm
1740 mmHeight1468 mm
1805 KgWeight1735 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Freelander and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…