DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeJaguar
CaptivaModelXF
2013Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
AutomaticTransmission—
17Tyre size—
NoABSYes

Dimensions

4679 mmLength4961 mm
1868 mmWidth1939 mm
1756 mmHeight1468 mm
1903 kgWeight1735 Kg
447 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Chevrolet Captiva and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…