DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeOpel
F-PaceModelCascada
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
195 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption6,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/65 R18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4746 mmLength4696 mm
2070 mmWidth1839 mm
1667 mmHeight1443 mm
1690 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…