DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo XC60 vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJaguar
XC60ModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4644 mmLength4746 mm
1891 mmWidth2070 mm
1713 mmHeight1667 mm
1843 KgWeight1690 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo XC60 and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…