DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Opel Cascada vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeJaguar
CascadaModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
218 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4746 mm
1839 mmWidth2070 mm
1443 mmHeight1667 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1690 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Opel Cascada and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…