DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeNissan
F-PaceModelX-Trail
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
163 HPPower177 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/65 R18Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4746 mmLength4640 mm
2070 mmWidth1820 mm
1667 mmHeight1715 mm
1690 KgWeight1540-1600 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…