DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlfa Romeo
F-PaceModelGiulia
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
163 HPPower180 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/65 R18Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4746 mmLength4643 mm
2070 mmWidth1860 mm
1667 mmHeight1436 mm
1690 KgWeight1374 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo Giulia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…