1996 • Isuzu
Rodeo
Isuzu Rodeo 3.2 i 4WD LS (177 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Isuzu Rodeo vs 1996 Mercury Sable Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationMercury Sable
IsuzuMakeMercury
RodeoModelSable
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationMercury Sable
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
177 HPPower147 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationMercury Sable
PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationMercury Sable
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/75 R15 PTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationMercury Sable
4480 mmLength5070 mm
1690 mmWidth1850 mm
1660 mmHeight1410 mm
1791 KgWeight1535 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Isuzu Rodeo and 1996 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…