DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs 1996 Isuzu Rodeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OldsmobileMakeIsuzu
CutlassModelRodeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3135 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
141 HPPower177 HP
251 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank83 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size225/75 R15 P
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4921 mmLength4480 mm
1804 mmWidth1690 mm
1391 mmHeight1660 mm
1450 KgWeight1791 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass and 1996 Isuzu Rodeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…