DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Aerostar vs 1996 Isuzu Rodeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeIsuzu
AerostarModelRodeo
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
147 HPPower177 HP
224 NmTorque260 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank83 lt
16 ltUrban consumption—
11 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/75 R14Tyre size225/75 R15 P
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4480 mm
1820 mmWidth1690 mm
1850 mmHeight1660 mm
1530 KgWeight1791 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Aerostar and 1996 Isuzu Rodeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…