1996 • Isuzu
Rodeo
Isuzu Rodeo 3.2 i 4WD LS (177 Hp) 1996Overall Score64.5/100
1996 Isuzu Rodeo vs 1996 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 1996Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationFord Taurus
IsuzuMakeFord
RodeoModelTaurus
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
6Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationFord Taurus
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3165 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
177 HPPower147 HP
260 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationFord Taurus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
13,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationFord Taurus
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/75 R15 PTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu RodeoSpecificationFord Taurus
4480 mmLength5070 mm
1690 mmWidth1854 mm
1660 mmHeight1463 mm
1791 KgWeight1579 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Isuzu Rodeo and 1996 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…