2000 • Isuzu
Bighorn
Isuzu Bighorn 3.0 DT (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
2000 Isuzu Bighorn vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Challenger
Mitsubishi Challenger 2.8 TD (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Challenger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
IsuzuMakeMitsubishi
BighornModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
0 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
160 HPPower140 HP
333 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
85 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
245/70 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
4750 mmLength4530 mm
1745 mmWidth1775 mm
1840 mmHeight1730 mm
2080 KgWeight1850 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Isuzu Bighorn and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…