1999 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (157 Hp) 1999Overall Score68.25/100
1999 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Isuzu Bighorn Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Isuzu
Bighorn
Isuzu Bighorn 3.0 DT (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
68.25–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationIsuzu Bighorn
MercuryMakeIsuzu
SableModelBighorn
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationIsuzu Bighorn
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
157 HPPower160 HP
251 NmTorque333 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationIsuzu Bighorn
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank85 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationIsuzu Bighorn
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationIsuzu Bighorn
5070 mmLength4750 mm
1850 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1840 mm
1515 KgWeight2080 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mercury Sable and 2000 Isuzu Bighorn approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…