2000 • Isuzu
Bighorn
Isuzu Bighorn 3.0 DT (160 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
2000 Isuzu Bighorn vs 1999 Mercury Sable Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (157 Hp) 1999Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
67.75–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Sable
IsuzuMakeMercury
BighornModelSable
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Sable
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2999 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
160 HPPower157 HP
333 NmTorque251 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Sable
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Sable
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
245/70 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Isuzu BighornSpecificationMercury Sable
4750 mmLength5070 mm
1745 mmWidth1850 mm
1840 mmHeight1410 mm
2080 KgWeight1515 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Isuzu Bighorn and 1999 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…