E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 200 vs 1986 Audi 90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
AudiMakeAudi
200Model90
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
2393 ccEngine displacement2226 cc
136 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque170 Nm
—Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Average consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R14

Dimensions

Audi 200SpecificationAudi 90
4807 mmLength4465 mm
1814 mmWidth1682 mm
1422 mmHeight1376 mm
1290 KgWeight1200 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 200 and 1986 Audi 90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1986 Audi 90VS1986 Audi 200Audi 90 vs Audi 2001986 and 1986 model years1986 Audi CoupeVS1986 Audi 200Audi Coupe vs Audi 2001986 and 1986 model yearsImage unavailableVS1986 Audi 200BMW 5 Serisi vs Audi 2001986 and 1986 model years1986 Ford SierraVS1986 Audi 200Ford Sierra vs Audi 2001986 and 1986 model years1987 Audi 100VS1986 Audi 200Audi 100 vs Audi 2001987 and 1986 model years

Comments are loading…