DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Ford Sierra vs 1986 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Sierra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
FordMakeAudi
SierraModel200
1986Model year1986
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
143 HPPower136 HP
216 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Ford SierraSpecificationAudi 200
4425 mmLength4807 mm
1694 mmWidth1814 mm
1407 mmHeight1422 mm
—Weight1290 Kg
2608 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Ford Sierra and 1986 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Sierra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…