E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi 90 vs 1986 Audi 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.25–60.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
AudiMakeAudi
90Model200
1986Model year1986
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
9,6 s0–100 km/h—
189 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2226 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
120 HPPower136 HP
170 NmTorque0 Nm
5Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size205/60 R15

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationAudi 200
4465 mmLength4807 mm
1682 mmWidth1814 mm
1376 mmHeight1422 mm
1200 KgWeight1290 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi 90 and 1986 Audi 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1986 Ford MustangVS1986 Audi 90Ford Mustang vs Audi 901986 and 1986 model years1986 Nissan LeopardVS1986 Audi 90Nissan Leopard vs Audi 901986 and 1986 model years1986 Nissan SkylineVS1986 Audi 90Nissan Skyline vs Audi 901986 and 1986 model years1986 Audi 200VS1986 Audi 90Audi 200 vs Audi 901986 and 1986 model years1986 Oldsmobile CutlassVS1986 Audi 90Oldsmobile Cutlass vs Audi 901986 and 1986 model years

Comments are loading…